Is the bear phase over?

 

By R.N.Bhaskar


July 20, 2006 (published in the DNA); pdf version

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The pre-condition for sustained economic growth will be more and speedy reforms in education and labour, laws relating to the starting and stopping of factories, and the movement of goods across the country.

Without reforms, new investments in manufacturing will take longer to materialise; slowing down job formation, and hence purchasing power.  Domestic GDP is likely to grow slower.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Optimists have begun to look expectantly at the stockmarket indices once again.  They believe that – sooner rather than later – the bull run will resume.  It possibly will within a few months, but the big question is whether it can be sustained.
<>
And there are strong indications that storm clouds lie not far ahead. Take the first table.  One thing that amazes anyone about India is that while 21% of its GDP comes from exports, its share of world exports is just a meagre 1.8%.  When it comes to manufactured products, India’s share in the world market drops to just 0.8% compared to China’s 7.2%  (please refer to Table 1).   

Table 1: Key economic comparisons

 

 

Population (2005, millions)

GDP per head (2003, $ PPP)

Exports

(% GDP, 2005)

China

1,307.6

5,003

13

India

1,097.0

2,892

21

Brazil

183.9

7,790

17

Russian Fed

143.4

1,324

37

Source: HSBC reports and CEIC, World Bank, United Nations, IMF. *

 

 

 

 

 

 

<> <>Evidently, if India needs to make its mark in the world export market, it will need to export more, and also make its GDP expand much further.  This will require domestic consumption to increase rapidly; and that will require more purchasing power.  This can only come from more jobs. For this it will need more qualified people, more educated persons to man its factories, and more value-added from agriculture.  And that is where the key reform packages of India appear to be missing – allowing flexible policies in creating and moving jobs on the one hand, and corporate inputs in agriculture on the other.  Without them, new investments in manufacturing will take longer to materialise; slowing down job formation, and hence purchasing power.  Domestic GDP is likely to grow slower.

And it will need a great deal more money and skills going into education, failing which India could find itself in a growth trap; where opportunities beckon to its entrepreneurs, but the staff required to deliver on the orders may just not be available.
<> 
There is another reason why educating India’s teeming millions will become critically important.  Agriculture accounts for a significantly higher share of GDP for India than for many other countries.  India’s agriculture contributes as much as 21% to its GDP which is significantly higher compared to others for which data is available (Table 2). 
<> 

On the other hand, the contribution of industry to India’s GDP is one of the lowest.  While it is true that the contribution of services has swelled considerably, large scale employment and economic growth can only come from employment in the industry segment – particularly small and medium enterprises.  But to make this meaningful, investors will have to find (a) skilled employees, (b) flexible labour laws and (c) easy movement of goods across India and also in and out of India. 
<> 

The pre-condition for making this transition take place will be more and speedy reforms in education and labour, laws relating to the starting and stopping of factories, and the movement of goods across the country.  If these reforms don’t take place soon, foreign investors may soon decide to look elsewhere leaving the stockmarket bull a bit out of breath once again.

 

Table 2: GDP breakdown by sector (% shares, 2004)*

 

Agriculture

Industry

Services

Malaysia

10

50

40

Indonesia

15

44

41

Thailand

10

44

46

South Korea

4

41

56

Brazil

10

40

50

Argentina

10

36

54

Russian Fed.

5

35

60

Singapore

0

35

65

Poland

3

33

64

Philippines

14

32

54

Hungary

3

31

66

India

21

27

52

OECD

2

26

72

Hong Kong

0

11

89

All countries ranked according to average GDP growth achieved between 1970 and 1996

Source: World Bank and HSBC


Back.




© 2006 e-Convergence Technologies Ltd.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap | Contact Us